Cases4100534/2024

Claimant v Advanced Roofing Edinburgh Ltd

26 April 2024Before Employment Judge P O'DonnellScotlandremote video

Outcome

Claimant fails

Individual claims

Unfair Dismissalstruck out

The tribunal dismissed the claim for lack of jurisdiction as it was lodged out of time on 26 January 2024 when the time limit expired on 13 October 2023. The tribunal found it was reasonably practicable for the claim to have been lodged in time as the claimant had sought advice from CAB and ACAS shortly after dismissal, and should have made further enquiries sooner rather than waiting until January 2024.

Redundancy Paystruck out

The tribunal dismissed the claim for lack of jurisdiction as it was lodged out of time on 26 January 2024 when the time limit expired on 13 January 2024. The tribunal found it was reasonably practicable for the claim to have been lodged in time as the claimant had sought advice from CAB and ACAS and should have been informed of time limits by these advisers, and should have returned for further advice sooner.

Facts

The claimant was dismissed on 14 July 2023. About a week later he contacted Citizens Advice Bureau and ACAS for advice, who told him he needed a lawyer but did not mention the Employment Tribunal or time limits. The claimant spent months attempting to secure legal representation but could not afford the upfront fees required. During this time his parents were in hospital. He did not return to ACAS until 25 January 2024, when he was told he could represent himself and informed of time limits for the first time. He commenced ACAS early conciliation on 25 January 2024 and lodged his claim on 26 January 2024.

Decision

The tribunal dismissed both claims for lack of jurisdiction as they were lodged out of time. The tribunal found it was reasonably practicable for the claims to have been lodged in time. The claimant's ignorance of time limits was not reasonable given he had sought advice from CAB and ACAS shortly after dismissal, who should have informed him of time limits. The claimant should have returned for further advice much sooner rather than waiting over 6 months, especially as his attempts to secure legal representation were consistently unsuccessful from the outset.

Practical note

Advisers must inform claimants of Employment Tribunal time limits immediately, and claimants who cannot secure legal representation must make prompt further enquiries about their rights rather than assume they cannot proceed without a lawyer.

Legal authorities cited

Dedman v British Building and Engineering Appliances Ltd [1973] IRLR 379Northumberland County Council v Thompson UKEAT/209/07Westward Circuits Ltd v Read [1973] ICR 301Porter v Bandridge Ltd [1978] IRLR 271London International College v Sen [1992] IRLR 292Palmer and Saunders v Southend-on-Sea Borough Council [1984] IRLR 119Wall's Meat Co Ltd v Khan [1978] IRLR 49Avon County Council v Haywood-Hicks [1978] IRLR 118

Statutes

Employment Rights Act 1996 s.207BEmployment Rights Act 1996 s.111(2)(b)Employment Rights Act 1996 s.111(2)(a)

Case details

Case number
4100534/2024
Decision date
26 April 2024
Hearing type
preliminary
Hearing days
1
Classification
procedural

Respondent

Sector
construction
Represented
Yes
Rep type
lay rep

Claimant representation

Represented
No