Cases4103527/2023

Claimant v City of Edinburgh Council

18 April 2024Before Employment Judge L MurphyScotlandremote video

Outcome

Other

Individual claims

Direct Discrimination(disability)not determined

This preliminary hearing determined only that the claimant was a disabled person within the meaning of s.6 Equality Act 2010 during the material period (July 2022 to June 2023). The substantive merits of the discrimination claim have not yet been heard.

Discrimination Arising from Disability (s.15)(disability)not determined

This preliminary hearing determined only disability status. The claimant's complaint that the respondent's failure to progress disciplinary and grievance processes was unfavourable treatment because of something arising from disability has not yet been determined on the merits.

Failure to Make Reasonable Adjustments(disability)not determined

This preliminary hearing determined only disability status. The claimant's complaint that the respondent failed to make reasonable adjustments in relation to disciplinary and grievance processes has not yet been determined on the merits.

Facts

Mr Singh, a Building Surveyor employed by the City of Edinburgh Council since December 2017, was notified in 2018 of an investigation into misconduct allegations. He went off sick in June 2019 with work-related stress and remained absent through to the date of the preliminary hearing. From April 2019 onwards he experienced anxiety, disrupted sleep, poor concentration, low mood, impotence, tremors, and social withdrawal. He was prescribed Sertraline (antidepressant), Propranolol (beta-blockers) and Amitriptyline (for tension headaches) from 2019 onwards, with some gaps in prescription. He attended mental health courses offered by Wellbeing Services Glasgow and Inner Space Glasgow. He brought claims under the Equality Act 2010 sections 13, 15 and 20, alleging the respondent failed to progress disciplinary and grievance processes and failed to make reasonable adjustments from July 2022 onwards.

Decision

The tribunal determined that Mr Singh was a disabled person within the meaning of section 6 of the Equality Act 2010 during the material period (July 2022 to June 2023). The tribunal found he had a mental impairment that had substantial and long-term adverse effects on his ability to carry out normal day-to-day activities such as sleeping, reading, concentrating, and engaging in social interaction. The tribunal rejected the respondent's argument that the claimant's condition was merely an adverse reaction to circumstances rather than a mental impairment, noting the substantial nature and longevity of the effects. The tribunal accepted the claimant's evidence despite gaps in GP notes and some periods without prescription.

Practical note

A work-related stress condition that has substantial adverse effects on normal day-to-day activities lasting more than 12 months can constitute a mental impairment even without a formal diagnosis of clinical depression or anxiety disorder, and even where symptoms were initially triggered by workplace issues.

Legal authorities cited

J v DLA Piper UK LLP [2010] ICR 1052Goodwin v Patent Office [1999] ICR 302Herry v Dudley Metropolitan Council UKEAT/0100/16/LARayner v Turning Point and Ors UKEAT/0397/10All Answers Ltd v W [2021] IRLR 612Nissa v Waverly Education Foundation Ltd UKEAT/0135/18Boyle v SCA Packaging Ltd [2009] ICR 1056

Statutes

Equality Act 2010 Schedule 1 para 5(1)Equality Act 2010 s.6Equality Act 2010 s.13Equality Act 2010 s.15Equality Act 2010 s.212Equality Act 2010 Schedule 1 para 2(1)Equality Act 2010 s.20

Case details

Case number
4103527/2023
Decision date
18 April 2024
Hearing type
preliminary
Hearing days
1
Classification
procedural

Respondent

Sector
local government
Represented
Yes
Rep type
solicitor

Employment details

Role
Building Surveyor

Claimant representation

Represented
Yes
Rep type
solicitor