Cases100816/2010

Claimant v Inverclyde Council

4 March 2024Before Employment Judge Frances EcclesScotlandon papers

Outcome

Claimant fails

Individual claims

Otherstruck out

The claim was struck out under rule 37(1)(d) for failure to actively pursue. The claimant was given an opportunity to provide written reasons by 26 February 2024 or request a hearing but failed to respond or provide acceptable reasons why the claim should not be struck out.

Facts

The claimant filed a claim in 2010 against Inverclyde Council. On 12 February 2024, the Tribunal gave the claimant until 26 February 2024 to provide written reasons why the claim should not be struck out or to request a hearing. The claimant failed to respond or provide any acceptable reasons, and did not request a hearing.

Decision

The Tribunal struck out the claim under rule 37(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunals Rules 2013 on the grounds that the claim had not been actively pursued. The claimant was given an opportunity to show cause but failed to engage with the process.

Practical note

A claim that has been dormant for many years will be struck out for failure to actively pursue if the claimant does not respond to tribunal directions to show cause why it should continue.

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013 Schedule 1 rule 37Employment Tribunals Rules rule 37(1)(d)

Case details

Case number
100816/2010
Decision date
4 March 2024
Hearing type
strike out
Hearing days
Classification
procedural

Respondent

Name
Inverclyde Council
Sector
local government
Represented
No

Claimant representation

Represented
No