Cases2411508/2023

Claimant v Advanced Oncotherapy Limited

1 March 2024Before Employment Judge JohnsonManchesterremote video

Outcome

Claimant fails

Individual claims

Unlawful Deduction from Wagesstruck out

Claim presented out of time under s.23(2) ERA 1996. Claimant failed to show it was not reasonably practicable to present claim by 30 September 2023 deadline. He completed early conciliation quickly (21-27 July) leaving over two months to file, but delayed until 1 November in hope of resolution with employer. No evidence of employer misleading him or of incapacity preventing filing. Tribunal found claimant understood the process and could have informed himself of time limits via internet search, citing Cygnet principle that claimants must appraise themselves of time limits.

Facts

The claimant worked as a vacuum engineer from December 2021 to June 2023. He was not paid his wages for May 2023 (£3,952) or for 1-23 June 2023 (£2,382). The respondent acknowledged these sums were owed (with minor adjustments). The claimant ended his employment on 23 June 2023, completed early conciliation 21-27 July 2023, but did not file his claim until 1 November 2023, over a month late. He explained the delay by saying he hoped the employer would resolve the matter and pay him, and cited financial stress.

Decision

The tribunal dismissed the claim as presented out of time under s.23(2) ERA 1996. The deadline was 30 September 2023 (allowing for early conciliation). The claimant failed to show it was not reasonably practicable to file on time under s.23(4). The judge found the claimant understood the process, completed early conciliation quickly leaving over two months to file, and could have informed himself of time limits. Hope of resolution was not a reasonable basis for delay, particularly as no evidence showed the employer misled him or that he was incapacitated.

Practical note

Hope that an employer will pay outstanding wages does not make it not reasonably practicable to file a tribunal claim within the strict three-month time limit for unlawful deduction of wages claims; claimants must inform themselves of deadlines.

Legal authorities cited

London International College v Sen [1992] IRLR 292; [1993] IRLR 333Cygnet Behavioural Health Ltd v Britton [2022] IRLR 906Wall's Meat Co Ltd v Khan [1978] IRLR 499Palmer and Saunders v Southend-on-Sea Borough Council [1984] IRLR 119

Statutes

ERA 1996 s.13ERA 1996 s.23(4)ERA 1996 s.23(3)ERA 1996 s.23(2)

Case details

Case number
2411508/2023
Decision date
1 March 2024
Hearing type
preliminary
Hearing days
1
Classification
procedural

Respondent

Sector
healthcare
Represented
No

Employment details

Role
Vacuum Engineer
Service
2 years

Claimant representation

Represented
No