Cases2216037/2023

Claimant v Central and North West London NHS Foundation Trust

28 February 2024Before Employment Judge Susan WalkerLondon Centralremote video

Outcome

Claimant fails

Individual claims

Unfair Dismissalstruck out

The tribunal found the claimant did not have the requisite two years' continuous employment. He worked as a bank worker from April-October 2021 under a series of short contracts but a two-week break (26 September - 9 October 2021) when he went to Nigeria broke continuity of employment. From 18 October 2021 to 22 June 2023 gave him less than two years' continuous service as an employee. Therefore the tribunal had no jurisdiction.

Facts

The claimant worked as a bank (zero-hours) healthcare assistant for the respondent NHS Trust from April 2021, then became a permanent employee from 18 October 2021 until dismissal on 22 June 2023. He needed two years' continuous employment to claim unfair dismissal. The respondent argued his bank work did not count because there was no mutuality of obligation between shifts, and a two-week break in September-October 2021 when he went to Nigeria broke any continuity from short contracts during individual shifts.

Decision

The tribunal dismissed the claim for lack of jurisdiction. It found no global contract of employment during the bank worker period due to absence of mutuality of obligation between shifts — neither party was obliged to offer or accept work. While each individual shift was a contract of employment, the two-week break when the claimant went to Nigeria broke continuity under s.212 ERA. This meant he had less than two years' continuous service as required for unfair dismissal.

Practical note

Bank workers without mutuality of obligation between shifts cannot rely on continuity of employment through individual shift contracts if breaks exceed one week, unless a statutory exception applies — taking a holiday as a bank worker is not such an exception where there was no requirement to seek permission for absence.

Legal authorities cited

Ready Mixed Concrete v Minister of Pensions [1968] 2 QB 497Carmichael v National Power Plc [1999] 1 WLR 2042Pimlico Plumbers Ltd v Smith [2018] UKSC 29Stuart Delivery Ltd v Augustine [2021] EWCA Civ 1514Hellyer Brothers Ltd v McLeod [1987] ICR 526O'Kelly v Trusthouse Forte plc [1983] ICR 728Clark v Oxfordshire Health Authority [1998] IRLR 125Stringfellow Restaurants Ltd v Quashie [2013] IRLR 99McMeechan v Secretary of State for Employment [1997] ICR 549Cornwall County Council v Prater [2006] ICR 731Pola v R (Health and Safety Executive) [2009] EWCA Crim 655

Statutes

ERA 1996 s.230(3)ERA 1996 s.94ERA 1996 s.108ERA 1996 s.212ERA 1996 s.230(1)ERA 1996 s.230(2)

Case details

Case number
2216037/2023
Decision date
28 February 2024
Hearing type
strike out
Hearing days
1
Classification
procedural

Respondent

Sector
healthcare
Represented
Yes
Rep type
barrister

Employment details

Role
Healthcare Assistant
Service
2 years

Claimant representation

Represented
No