Claimant v Secretary of State for Business and Trade
Outcome
Individual claims
The tribunal found that the claimant was not an employee of The Sona Furniture Group Limited within the meaning of section 230 Employment Rights Act 1996 at the date the company became insolvent. Without employee status, the claimant had no entitlement to a statutory redundancy payment from the National Insurance Fund.
The tribunal determined that the respondent had no liability under Part XII Employment Rights Act 1996 because the claimant was not an employee at the relevant time. The claim for arrears of wages therefore could not succeed against the Secretary of State.
As the claimant was found not to be an employee within the meaning of section 230 ERA 1996 at the date of insolvency, he had no statutory entitlement to holiday pay that could be pursued against the Secretary of State under the insolvency payments scheme.
The tribunal found the claim for unpaid notice failed because the claimant did not have employee status under section 230 ERA 1996 at the relevant time, and therefore the respondent had no liability to pay notice pay from the National Insurance Fund.
Facts
The claimant sought payments from the Secretary of State following the insolvency of The Sona Furniture Group Limited, claiming redundancy pay, arrears of wages, unpaid holiday pay and unpaid notice. The central issue was whether the claimant had employee status under section 230 Employment Rights Act 1996 at the date the company became insolvent, which is a prerequisite for the Secretary of State's liability under the insolvency payments scheme.
Decision
The tribunal determined that the claimant was not an employee within the meaning of section 230 ERA 1996 at the relevant time. Consequently, the Secretary of State had no liability under Part XII ERA 1996, and all of the claimant's claims for redundancy payment, arrears of wages, holiday pay and notice pay failed.
Practical note
Claims against the Secretary of State under the insolvency payments scheme require proof of employee status under section 230 ERA 1996 at the date of insolvency; without this status, no liability arises regardless of the substantive merits of the underlying claims.
Legal authorities cited
Statutes
Case details
- Case number
- 2502335/2023
- Decision date
- 27 February 2024
- Hearing type
- full merits
- Hearing days
- 1
- Classification
- contested
Respondent
- Sector
- central government
- Represented
- Yes
- Rep type
- lay rep
Claimant representation
- Represented
- No