Claimant v South Elmsall Community Facilities Ltd
Outcome
Individual claims
At the hearing on 26 February 2024, the tribunal found the unfair dismissal claim well founded on the evidence presented. The respondent did not attend the hearing as they had failed to file a response to the claim, having not updated their registered office address at Companies House.
At the hearing on 26 February 2024, the tribunal found the wrongful dismissal claim well founded on the evidence presented. The respondent did not attend the hearing as they had failed to file a response to the claim.
Facts
The claimant brought claims for unfair and wrongful dismissal which succeeded on 26 February 2024 when the respondent failed to attend the hearing. The respondent had not filed a response because correspondence was sent to their registered office at 122 Westfield Lane, which they had vacated in 2019 but failed to update at Companies House until March 2024. The respondent applied for reconsideration after being contacted by Peninsula Business Services in March 2024, claiming they had no notice of the proceedings.
Decision
The tribunal refused the application for reconsideration, finding the respondent's failure to receive correspondence was due entirely to its own culpable default in not updating its registered office at Companies House for five years. The claimant's representatives had acted properly throughout by serving documents at the registered office and attempting to obtain alternative contact details. In balancing the interests of justice, the tribunal found the public interest in finality of litigation and the prejudice to the claimant outweighed any injustice to the respondent.
Practical note
A respondent's culpable default in failing to maintain accurate records at Companies House will not justify setting aside a judgment in the interests of justice, even where the respondent had no actual notice of proceedings.
Award breakdown
Legal authorities cited
Statutes
Case details
- Case number
- 1806473/2023
- Decision date
- 26 February 2024
- Hearing type
- reconsideration
- Hearing days
- 1
- Classification
- procedural
Respondent
- Sector
- other
- Represented
- Yes
- Rep type
- lay rep
Claimant representation
- Represented
- Yes
- Rep type
- barrister