Claimant v The Knowles Care Home Ltd
Outcome
Individual claims
The tribunal found that the respondent genuinely believed the claimant was guilty of gross misconduct related to failures in managing care home operations over the weekend of 8-9 October 2022, including controlled drug counts, medication stock management, and oversight of resident care. The respondent had reasonable grounds for this belief based on documented incidents and the claimant's admissions. A reasonable investigation was conducted including investigatory and disciplinary meetings where the claimant had opportunity to respond. Dismissal (with demotion offered as alternative) fell within the range of reasonable responses given the vulnerability of service users and the seriousness of care failures, despite the claimant's four years' service.
Facts
The claimant was deputy manager at a care home. On the weekend of 8-9 October 2022, when the manager was off, multiple care failures occurred including a resident fall not being properly documented, controlled drug counts not being done, medication running out, and inadequate resident care regarding fluids and showers. The claimant was the duty manager for these shifts alongside senior care staff. Following investigation, she was dismissed for gross misconduct on 30 October 2022, having been offered demotion as an alternative which she declined. She appealed unsuccessfully. The claimant did not attend the tribunal hearing, citing anxiety, though provided a brief written statement.
Decision
The tribunal found the dismissal was fair. The reason was conduct (gross misconduct). The respondent genuinely believed the claimant was guilty of serious failures in managing the care home, had reasonable grounds for this belief based on documented incidents, and conducted a reasonable investigation including investigatory and disciplinary meetings with appeal. Dismissal fell within the range of reasonable responses given the vulnerability of service users and the seriousness of the care failures, even though the claimant had delegated some tasks to others.
Practical note
A dismissal for gross misconduct can be fair even where tasks were partly delegated to others, if a deputy manager in a care home setting failed to properly oversee vulnerable residents' care, particularly regarding medication safety and basic care needs.
Legal authorities cited
Statutes
Case details
- Case number
- 1301720/2023
- Decision date
- 5 February 2024
- Hearing type
- full merits
- Hearing days
- 1
- Classification
- contested
Respondent
- Sector
- healthcare
- Represented
- Yes
- Rep type
- solicitor
Employment details
- Role
- Deputy Manager
- Service
- 4 years
Claimant representation
- Represented
- No