Cases2602961/2020

Claimant v JDP Frames Limited (in Administration)

16 January 2024Before Employment Judge McTigueNottinghamon papers

Outcome

Claimant succeeds

Individual claims

Failure to Inform & Consultsucceeded

The tribunal granted a declaration that the respondent failed to comply with section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992, which requires employers to inform and consult with trade unions when proposing collective redundancies. The respondent did not appear to contest the claim, resulting in a default judgment in the claimants' favour with a maximum protective award of 90 days.

Facts

JDP Frames Limited went into administration and made 22 employees redundant on 8 April 2020. The GMB Union brought collective claims on behalf of these employees alleging that the employer failed to comply with its statutory duty to inform and consult with the union before making collective redundancies. Neither the respondent company (in administration) nor the Secretary of State appeared or responded to the claims.

Decision

The tribunal granted a declaration that the respondent had failed to comply with section 188 of TULRCA 1992 and made a protective award for the maximum period of 90 days beginning 8 April 2020. This is a two-stage process where the tribunal declares entitlement to the award but does not quantify individual amounts - claimants must now seek payment from the respondent.

Practical note

When employers fail to inform and consult on collective redundancies, tribunals will award the maximum 90-day protective award where respondents do not participate, though claimants must then separately quantify and claim individual amounts under section 192.

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 s.188Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 s.189Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 s.192Employment Protection (Recoupment of Jobseekers Allowance and Income Support) Regulations 1996

Case details

Case number
2602961/2020
Decision date
16 January 2024
Hearing type
default judgment
Hearing days
Classification
procedural

Respondent

Sector
manufacturing
Represented
No

Claimant representation

Represented
Yes
Rep type
union