Cases100775/2010

Claimant v Inverclyde Council

11 January 2024Before Employment Judge Frances EcclesScotlandon papers

Outcome

Claimant fails

Individual claims

Otherstruck out

The claim was struck out under rule 37(1)(d) for failure to actively pursue it. The claimant was given until 21 November 2023 to provide written reasons or request a hearing as to why the claim should not be struck out, but failed to provide an acceptable reason or request a hearing.

Facts

This was a claim filed in 2010 by Mrs Hunter against Inverclyde Council. By 2023, the claim had not been actively pursued. On 7 November 2023, the Tribunal gave the claimant until 21 November 2023 to provide written reasons why the claim should not be struck out or to request a hearing. The claimant failed to respond with acceptable reasons or request a hearing.

Decision

The Tribunal struck out the claim under rule 37(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunals Rules on the grounds that it had not been actively pursued. The claimant was given an opportunity to explain why the claim should continue but failed to provide an acceptable reason or request a hearing.

Practical note

Claimants must actively pursue their claims; failure to respond to tribunal directions about strike-out will result in the claim being dismissed for want of prosecution.

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013 Schedule 1 rule 37Employment Tribunals Rules rule 37(1)(d)

Case details

Case number
100775/2010
Decision date
11 January 2024
Hearing type
strike out
Hearing days
Classification
procedural

Respondent

Name
Inverclyde Council
Sector
local government
Represented
No

Claimant representation

Represented
No