Cases100726/2010

Claimant v Inverclyde Council

10 January 2024Before Employment Judge Frances EcclesScotlandon papers

Outcome

Claimant fails

Individual claims

Otherstruck out

The claim was struck out under rule 37(1)(d) for failure to actively pursue. The claimant was given until 21 November 2023 to provide written reasons or request a hearing but failed to provide an acceptable reason or request a hearing.

Facts

Mrs Donnachie brought a claim against Inverclyde Council in 2010. The claim was not actively pursued. On 7 November 2023, the Tribunal gave the claimant until 21 November 2023 to provide written reasons why the claim should not be struck out or to request a hearing. The claimant failed to respond appropriately.

Decision

The Tribunal struck out the claim under rule 37(1)(d) on grounds of non-pursuit. The claimant was given a clear deadline and opportunity to respond but failed to provide an acceptable reason or request a hearing, leading to the strike-out.

Practical note

Claimants must actively pursue their claims and respond to tribunal unless orders, or face strike-out even in long-standing cases.

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013 Schedule 1 rule 37Rule 37(1)(d)

Case details

Case number
100726/2010
Decision date
10 January 2024
Hearing type
strike out
Hearing days
Classification
procedural

Respondent

Sector
local government
Represented
No

Claimant representation

Represented
No