Cases101828/2009

Claimant v Inverclyde Council

10 January 2024Before Employment Judge Frances EcclesScotlandon papers

Outcome

Claimant fails

Individual claims

Otherstruck out

The claim was struck out under rule 37(1)(d) for failure to actively pursue. The claimant was given until 24 November 2023 to provide written reasons or request a hearing but failed to do so or provide acceptable reasons why the claim should not be struck out.

Facts

The claimant filed a claim in 2009 against Inverclyde Council. By November 2023, the claim had not been actively pursued. On 10 November 2023, the tribunal gave the claimant until 24 November 2023 to provide written reasons why the claim should not be struck out or to request a hearing. The claimant failed to respond or provide acceptable reasons.

Decision

The tribunal struck out the claim under rule 37(1)(d) on the grounds that it had not been actively pursued. The claimant was given an opportunity to respond but failed to do so, resulting in the claim being dismissed.

Practical note

Tribunals will strike out claims that are not actively pursued, particularly where claimants fail to respond to tribunal orders or warnings about potential strike-out.

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013 Schedule 1 rule 37Rule 37(1)(d)

Case details

Case number
101828/2009
Decision date
10 January 2024
Hearing type
strike out
Hearing days
Classification
procedural

Respondent

Sector
local government
Represented
No

Claimant representation

Represented
No