Cases100735/2010

Claimant v Inverclyde Council

10 January 2024Before Employment Judge Frances EcclesScotlandon papers

Outcome

Claimant fails

Individual claims

Otherstruck out

The claim was struck out under rule 37(1)(d) for failure to actively pursue. The claimant was given an opportunity to provide written reasons or request a hearing by 21 November 2023 but failed to do so or provide acceptable reasons why the claim should not be struck out.

Facts

The claimant filed a claim in 2010 against Inverclyde Council. The case remained dormant for over a decade. On 7 November 2023, the Tribunal gave the claimant until 21 November 2023 to provide written reasons why the claim should not be struck out, or to request a hearing. The claimant failed to respond or provide acceptable reasons.

Decision

The Tribunal struck out the claim under rule 37(1)(d) on the grounds that it had not been actively pursued. The claimant was given a final opportunity to explain why the claim should continue but failed to engage with the Tribunal's unless order.

Practical note

Claimants must actively pursue their claims or risk strike-out, and failure to respond to an unless order giving a final opportunity to engage will result in the claim being dismissed.

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013, Schedule 1, rule 37(1)(d)

Case details

Case number
100735/2010
Decision date
10 January 2024
Hearing type
strike out
Hearing days
Classification
procedural

Respondent

Sector
local government
Represented
No

Claimant representation

Represented
No