Cases100922/2010

Claimant v Inverclyde Council

9 January 2024Before Employment Judge Frances EcclesScotlandon papers

Outcome

Claimant fails

Individual claims

Otherstruck out

The claim was struck out under rule 37(1)(d) for failure to actively pursue. The claimant was given until 24 November 2023 to provide reasons or request a hearing but failed to respond or provide acceptable reasons.

Facts

Mrs McDevitt filed a claim against Inverclyde Council in 2010. The claim appears to have been dormant for a significant period. On 10 November 2023, the tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to provide written reasons by 24 November 2023 or request a hearing to explain why the claim should not be struck out. The claimant failed to respond or provide acceptable reasons.

Decision

The tribunal struck out the claim under rule 37(1)(d) on the grounds that it had not been actively pursued. The claimant was given a final opportunity to respond or request a hearing but failed to do so.

Practical note

Claims that are not actively pursued for extended periods will be struck out, even after claimants are given a final opportunity to explain their inaction.

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013, Schedule 1, rule 37Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013, Schedule 1, rule 37(1)(d)

Case details

Case number
100922/2010
Decision date
9 January 2024
Hearing type
strike out
Hearing days
Classification
procedural

Respondent

Sector
local government
Represented
No

Claimant representation

Represented
No