Cases1801364/2023

Claimant v Nestle UK Limited

9 January 2024Before Regional Employment Judge RobertsonLeedson papers

Outcome

Claimant fails

Individual claims

Otherstruck out

The claim was struck out under rule 39(4) because the claimant failed to pay a deposit ordered by the Tribunal on 13 October 2023. The claimant's failure to comply with the deposit order resulted in automatic strike-out of the claim.

Facts

Mr Fleet brought a claim against Nestle UK Limited. On 13 October 2023, the Tribunal made a deposit order. The claimant failed to pay the deposit as ordered.

Decision

Regional Employment Judge Robertson struck out the claim under rule 39(4) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 due to the claimant's failure to pay the deposit ordered. The strike-out was automatic upon non-payment.

Practical note

Failure to pay a tribunal-ordered deposit results in automatic strike-out of the claim under rule 39(4), regardless of the underlying merits.

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 rule 39(4)

Case details

Case number
1801364/2023
Decision date
9 January 2024
Hearing type
strike out
Hearing days
Classification
procedural

Respondent

Sector
manufacturing
Represented
No

Claimant representation

Represented
No