Cases101734/2009

Claimant v Inverclyde Council

9 January 2024Before Employment Judge Frances EcclesScotlandon papers

Outcome

Claimant fails

Individual claims

Otherstruck out

The claim was struck out under rule 37(1)(d) for failure to actively pursue. The claimant was given until 24 November 2023 to provide written reasons or request a hearing as to why the claim should not be struck out, but failed to provide an acceptable reason or request a hearing.

Facts

A claim filed in 2009 against Inverclyde Council had not been actively pursued by the claimant. On 10 November 2023, the tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to provide written reasons by 24 November 2023 or request a hearing to explain why the claim should not be struck out. The claimant failed to respond with an acceptable reason or request a hearing.

Decision

The tribunal struck out the claim under rule 37(1)(d) on the grounds that it had not been actively pursued. The claimant was given a fair opportunity to explain why the claim should continue but failed to provide any acceptable reason or engage with the tribunal's process.

Practical note

Claims that are not actively pursued, even after being given a final opportunity to explain why they should continue, will be struck out by the tribunal for non-pursuit.

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013 Schedule 1 rule 37Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013 Schedule 1 rule 37(1)(d)

Case details

Case number
101734/2009
Decision date
9 January 2024
Hearing type
strike out
Hearing days
Classification
procedural

Respondent

Sector
local government
Represented
No

Claimant representation

Represented
No