Cases100807/2010

Claimant v Inverclyde Council

9 January 2024Before Employment Judge Frances EcclesScotlandon papers

Outcome

Claimant fails

Individual claims

Otherstruck out

The claim was struck out under rule 37(1)(d) for failure to actively pursue. The claimant was given until 23 November 2023 to provide written reasons or request a hearing to show cause why the claim should not be struck out, but failed to respond or provide acceptable reasons.

Facts

Miss C Kelly filed a claim against Inverclyde Council in 2010. The case remained dormant for many years. On 9 November 2023, the Tribunal gave the claimant until 23 November 2023 to provide written reasons or request a hearing to show cause why the claim should not be struck out for failure to actively pursue. The claimant failed to respond.

Decision

The tribunal struck out the claim under rule 37(1)(d) on the grounds that it had not been actively pursued. The claimant was given an opportunity to explain or request a hearing but failed to provide acceptable reasons or make any response.

Practical note

Claimants must actively pursue their claims and respond to tribunal orders, or risk having their claim struck out even if it was filed years earlier.

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013, Schedule 1, rule 37Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013, Schedule 1, rule 37(1)(d)

Case details

Case number
100807/2010
Decision date
9 January 2024
Hearing type
strike out
Hearing days
Classification
procedural

Respondent

Sector
local government
Represented
No

Claimant representation

Represented
No