Cases4106293/2022

Claimant v Arjowiggins Scotland Limited (in Administration)

9 January 2024Before Employment Judge M RobisonScotlandremote video

Outcome

Claimant succeeds

Individual claims

Failure to Inform & Consultpartly succeeded

This was a reconsideration application to vary previous protective award judgments. The tribunal granted the application to replace 'manual workers' with 'all workers' in the collective bargaining unit, extending the protective award to all employees based on evidence of custom and practice that pay negotiations covered all employees, not just manual workers.

Facts

Unite the Union applied to reconsider previous protective award judgments which had limited the award to 'manual workers'. Evidence from the former HR Director and union representatives established that while national collective agreements covered production and engineering workers, the custom and practice at the respondent paper mill was that pay negotiations conducted by Unite resulted in pay increases for all employees (manual, office staff, and management). This practice had been in place since at least 2012. The respondent had gone into administration and did not oppose the application.

Decision

The tribunal granted the reconsideration application despite it being late, finding the balance of prejudice favoured the claimants and there was no opposition from the administrators or Secretary of State. Based on the evidence of custom and practice, the tribunal found that Unite was recognised as negotiating for all employees, not just manual workers. The original judgments were varied to replace 'manual' with 'all' workers in the collective bargaining unit.

Practical note

Trade union recognition for collective consultation purposes can be established through long-standing custom and practice, even where written agreements may suggest a narrower scope, particularly where pay negotiations consistently resulted in awards applied to all employees.

Legal authorities cited

Lawrynowicz v Bidvest Noonan (UK) Ltd 2024 EAT 13Ladd v MarshallUSDAW v Sketchley Ltd 1981 IRLR 291National Union of Tailors and Garment Workers v Charles Ingram Ltd 1977 IRLR 147Baisley v South Lanarkshire Council 2017 ICR 365Phipps v Priory Education Services Ltd 2023 IRLR 851Outasight VB Ltd v Brown UKEAT/0253/14

Statutes

TULCRA 1992 s.188TULCRA 1992 s.178TULCRA 1992 s.190TULCRA 1992 s.189

Case details

Case number
4106293/2022
Decision date
9 January 2024
Hearing type
reconsideration
Hearing days
1
Classification
procedural

Respondent

Sector
manufacturing
Represented
No

Claimant representation

Represented
Yes
Rep type
barrister