Cases100931/2010

Claimant v Inverclyde Council

9 January 2024Before Employment Judge Frances EcclesScotlandon papers

Outcome

Claimant fails

Individual claims

Otherstruck out

The claim was struck out under rule 37(1)(d) for failure to actively pursue. The claimant failed to respond to the tribunal's notice dated 10 November 2023 which gave her until 24 November 2023 to provide reasons why the claim should not be struck out or to request a hearing.

Facts

This is a long-running claim filed in 2010 by Mrs McCurdy against Inverclyde Council. By 2023, the claim had not been actively pursued. The tribunal issued notice on 10 November 2023 giving the claimant until 24 November 2023 to provide reasons why the claim should not be struck out or to request a hearing. The claimant failed to respond or provide any acceptable reason.

Decision

The tribunal struck out the claim under rule 37(1)(d) for failure to actively pursue. The claimant was given fair notice and opportunity to respond but failed to do so. The claim, which had been outstanding for over 13 years, was therefore dismissed.

Practical note

Claimants must actively pursue their claims and respond to tribunal orders, or risk strike-out for non-pursuit under rule 37(1)(d), even in long-running cases.

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013 Schedule 1 rule 37Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013 Schedule 1 rule 37(1)(d)

Case details

Case number
100931/2010
Decision date
9 January 2024
Hearing type
strike out
Hearing days
Classification
procedural

Respondent

Sector
local government
Represented
No

Claimant representation

Represented
No