Cases3301922/2024

Claimant v Prism Electronics Limited (in Administration)

10 November 2025Before Employment Judge TynanCambridge

Outcome

Claimant succeeds£39,147

Individual claims

Unfair Dismissalsucceeded

The tribunal determined at an earlier hearing that the claimant was unfairly dismissed by the respondent. This remedy judgment quantifies the compensation due to the claimant following that liability finding.

Facts

This was a remedy hearing following an earlier liability finding that the claimant was unfairly dismissed by Prism Electronics Limited, a company in administration. The respondent did not attend the remedy hearing and was not represented. The tribunal assessed the claimant's actual losses at £30,835.66.

Decision

The tribunal awarded the claimant a basic award of £9,639.00 and a compensatory award of £29,507.92, the latter being capped by the statutory limit under section 124(1ZA) ERA 1996. Total compensation awarded was £39,146.92.

Practical note

Where a respondent company is in administration and does not participate in remedy proceedings, the tribunal will still carefully assess and award appropriate compensation subject to statutory caps.

Award breakdown

Basic award£9,639
Compensatory award£29,508

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

ERA 1996 s.124(1ZA)

Case details

Case number
3301922/2024
Decision date
10 November 2025
Hearing type
remedy
Hearing days
1
Classification
contested

Respondent

Sector
technology
Represented
No

Claimant representation

Represented
No