Cases6020824/2024

Claimant v Signature Medical Limited

9 September 2025Before Employment Judge ShotterManchesterremote video

Outcome

Claimant fails

Individual claims

Breach of Contractfailed

The tribunal found it had no jurisdiction to consider the claim as it did not arise or remain outstanding at termination. The claimant sought commission on surgeries performed after his employment ended on 11 November 2024. The tribunal concluded that commission payments ended on termination and the claimant had no prospective right to post-termination commission under the contract.

Facts

The claimant was employed as Head of Business Development from 16 March 2023 to 11 November 2024 on a salary of £30,000 plus commission. His role involved recruiting referees/influencers who would refer potential customers for cosmetic surgery, generating commission shared between the claimant and the referee. The claimant's employment was terminated on 11 November 2024 and he accepted all commission due for surgeries completed up to that date had been paid. He claimed £55,000 for commission on surgeries performed after his termination under marketing contracts he had negotiated during his employment, which had three-year fixed terms.

Decision

The tribunal dismissed the claim on jurisdictional grounds, finding that the claim did not arise or remain outstanding at termination as required by Article 3 of the Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction Order 1994. The claimant sought commission on future post-termination surgeries which were uncertain and prospective. Alternatively, the tribunal found there was no contractual entitlement to post-termination commission as the commission arrangements ended with the employment relationship on 11 November 2024.

Practical note

Employment tribunals have no jurisdiction to hear breach of contract claims for post-termination commission on future uncertain earnings where the claim did not arise or remain outstanding at the effective date of termination, even where the employee negotiated ongoing marketing contracts during employment.

Legal authorities cited

Marshal (Cambridge) Ltd v Hamblin [1994] ICR 962Fentem v Outform EMEA Ltd EA-2020-000851-BAWood v Capita Insurance [2017] UKSC 24

Statutes

Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (England and Wales) Order 1994, Article 4(c)Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (England and Wales) Order 1994, Article 3

Case details

Case number
6020824/2024
Decision date
9 September 2025
Hearing type
full merits
Hearing days
1
Classification
contested

Respondent

Sector
healthcare
Represented
Yes
Rep type
barrister

Employment details

Role
Head of Business Development
Salary band
£30,000–£40,000
Service
2 years

Claimant representation

Represented
No