44
Total cases
30
Contested
36.7%
Claimant success
contested only · 30 cases
£3,932
Average award
where awarded
3
Avg hearing days
Contested hearing outcomes
Claimant succeeds11 (36.7%)
Respondent succeeds19 (63.3%)
“Claimant succeeds” includes fully and partly successful claims. Based on 30 contested hearings.
Case classification
30
Contested
6
Procedural
8
Default
Recent contested hearings
Claimant v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions30 December 2025
Claimant v Betsi Cadwaladr University Local Health Board16 December 2025
Claimant v Sysco GB Limited20 November 2025
Claimant v Respondent6 November 2025
Claimant v Daisy Communications Ltd28 October 2025
Claimant v Aneurin Bevan University Health Board24 October 2025
Claimant v Krystal CSG Limited20 October 2025
£302
Claimant v Signature Medical Limited9 September 2025
Claimant v B&M Retail Limited21 August 2025
Claimant v The Chief Constable of South Wales Police12 August 2025
Claimant v University Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust6 August 2025
Claimant v TBD Holdings Manchester Ltd17 July 2025
£2,623
Claimant v Great Academies Education Trust4 June 2025
Claimant v Weston Factory Meals Ltd3 June 2025
Claimant v Hybu Cig Cymru - Meat Promotion Wales2 June 2025
Claimant v The Chief Constable of Greater Manchester Police7 May 2025
Claimant v Pansy Corna Limited (creditors voluntary liquidation)25 April 2025
£12,085
Claimant v Capital Recruitment Group Limited4 April 2025
Claimant v Diverse Active Living Day Service31 March 2025
£350
Claimant v National Trust for Places of Historic Interest or Natural Beauty18 March 2025
Most heard claim types
Harassment16
Direct Discrimination15
Unlawful Deduction from Wages14
Discrimination Arising from Disability (s.15)12
Victimisation11
About these figures
Figures are derived from published tribunal decisions on GOV.UK. Not all decisions are published. Success rates reflect contested hearings only and exclude procedural disposals and default judgments. These figures describe case outcomes and should not be interpreted as a measure of judicial quality.