Cases6013955/2024

Claimant v University Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust

6 August 2025Before Employment Judge ShotterLiverpoolhybrid

Outcome

Claimant fails

Individual claims

Failure to Make Reasonable Adjustments(disability)struck out

The tribunal found that the claimant was a volunteer, not an employee or worker of the respondent. As an unpaid volunteer with no contractual relationship with the respondent, the claimant did not fall within the definition of 'employment' under section 83(2) of the Equality Act 2010. The tribunal applied X v Mid Sussex Citizens Advice Bureau and concluded that the tribunal had no jurisdiction to hear the claim, which was therefore dismissed.

Facts

The claimant was an unpaid, publicly elected volunteer governor for the respondent NHS Trust from October 2023 to March 2025. He had hearing problems and was provided with IT equipment to produce live captions at meetings. On 25 July 2024, the claimant was told to stop using the captioning equipment during a confidential meeting and to delete the transcript. He brought a claim of disability discrimination alleging failure to make reasonable adjustments. The respondent argued the claimant was a volunteer, not an employee or worker, and the tribunal had no jurisdiction.

Decision

The tribunal dismissed the claim on jurisdictional grounds, finding that the claimant was an unpaid volunteer with no contractual relationship with the respondent. Applying the Supreme Court decision in X v Mid Sussex Citizens Advice Bureau, the tribunal held that volunteers are not covered by the Equality Act 2010 employment provisions. The claimant had no contractual obligation to work, no entitlement to remuneration, and could resign at any time without remedy. The claim of disability discrimination therefore fell outside the tribunal's jurisdiction.

Practical note

Unpaid volunteer public governors in NHS Trusts are not employees or workers for the purposes of the Equality Act 2010 and cannot bring discrimination claims in the Employment Tribunal.

Legal authorities cited

X v Mid Sussex Citizens Advice Bureau and anor [2013] ICR 249, SCGilham v Ministry of Justice (Protect intervening) [2019] ICR 1655, SCSouth East Sheffield Citizens Advice Bureau v Grayson [2004] ICR 1138, EAT

Statutes

Equality Act 2010 s.49-51Equality Act 2010 s.83(2)Equality Act 2010 s.39(5)Equality Act 2010 s.20-21Equality Act 2010 s.52(5)NHS Act 2006 Schedule 7European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018

Case details

Case number
6013955/2024
Decision date
6 August 2025
Hearing type
preliminary
Hearing days
1
Classification
contested

Respondent

Sector
healthcare
Represented
Yes
Rep type
solicitor

Employment details

Role
Public Governor for Bidston and Claughton
Service
1 years

Claimant representation

Represented
No