Cases6008786/2025

Claimant v Lidl Great Britain Limited

4 July 2025Before Employment Judge TuejeLondon Southremote video

Outcome

Claimant fails

Individual claims

Unfair Dismissalfailed

The tribunal found the complaint of unfair dismissal was not well-founded after a two-day full merits hearing. The judgment indicates the claim was dismissed after consideration of evidence and submissions from both parties.

Facts

Taofikq Bello brought an unfair dismissal claim against his former employer Lidl Great Britain Limited. The case was heard over two days by CVP at London South Employment Tribunal. The claimant appeared in person, assisted by his daughter Aminat Bello, while the respondent was represented by a solicitor, Ms Williams.

Decision

Employment Judge Tueje dismissed the unfair dismissal complaint, finding it was not well-founded. The judgment was issued following a full merits hearing with evidence and submissions from both parties.

Practical note

This judgment represents a loss for a self-represented claimant against a represented retail employer in an unfair dismissal claim heard remotely.

Case details

Case number
6008786/2025
Decision date
4 July 2025
Hearing type
full merits
Hearing days
2
Classification
contested

Respondent

Sector
retail
Represented
Yes
Rep type
solicitor

Claimant representation

Represented
No