Cases2500305/2024

Claimant v Amazon UK Services Limited

23 June 2025Before Employment Judge HeatherNewcastle upon Tynein person

Outcome

Claimant fails

Individual claims

Breach of Contractfailed

The tribunal found the complaint of breach of contract in relation to notice pay was not well-founded and dismissed the claim. Reasons were given orally at the hearing.

Unfair Dismissalfailed

The tribunal determined the complaint of unfair dismissal was not well-founded and dismissed the claim. Reasons were provided orally at the hearing.

Direct Discrimination(disability)failed

The tribunal found the complaint of direct disability discrimination was not well-founded and dismissed the claim. Reasons were given orally at the hearing.

Failure to Make Reasonable Adjustments(disability)failed

The tribunal determined the complaint of failure to make reasonable adjustments for disability was not well-founded and dismissed the claim. Reasons were provided orally at the hearing.

Facts

Miss Mikolajczak brought claims against Amazon UK Services Limited relating to her dismissal. She alleged unfair dismissal, breach of contract in relation to notice pay, direct disability discrimination, and failure to make reasonable adjustments for her disability. The hearing took place over five days in Newcastle with the claimant appearing in person with the assistance of an interpreter, while Amazon was represented by counsel.

Decision

The tribunal dismissed all four claims, finding none of them to be well-founded. The tribunal provided oral reasons at the hearing explaining why each complaint failed. No awards were made to the claimant.

Practical note

A self-represented claimant with a disability failed to establish any of her claims against Amazon despite a five-day hearing, highlighting the challenges faced by unrepresented claimants in complex employment litigation.

Case details

Case number
2500305/2024
Decision date
23 June 2025
Hearing type
full merits
Hearing days
5
Classification
contested

Respondent

Sector
technology
Represented
Yes
Rep type
barrister

Claimant representation

Represented
No