Cases2401197/2024

Claimant v Great Academies Education Trust

4 June 2025Before Employment Judge ShotterLiverpoolremote video

Outcome

Claimant fails

Individual claims

Unfair Dismissalfailed

The tribunal found the claimant was fairly dismissed for gross misconduct. The respondent held a genuine belief based on reasonable grounds after a reasonable investigation that the claimant was guilty of misconduct including discriminatory comments towards pupils, breaches of safeguarding procedures, and failure to correct behaviour despite a warning in March 2022. Dismissal was within the band of reasonable responses.

Facts

The claimant was a mathematics teacher employed since November 2018 with a good record. Between March 2022 and December 2022, multiple pupils complained about his conduct including calling a female student 'Hideous H', telling a male student with mental health issues his girlfriend 'could do better', referring to a Muslim student wearing a hijab as 'Z the nun' and allegedly asking if she had a bomb under her hijab, calling a female student a 'dumb blonde', asking students which teachers they found attractive, and breaching safeguarding instructions by publicly questioning why a vulnerable student had no photograph on the school system. The claimant was informally warned in March 2022 to be 'mindful' of comments but behaviour continued. Following investigation he was summarily dismissed for gross misconduct on 27 September 2023.

Decision

The tribunal dismissed the unfair dismissal claim. The respondent held a genuine belief based on reasonable grounds after a reasonable investigation that the claimant committed gross misconduct including discrimination, safeguarding breaches, and failure to correct behaviour despite warning. The investigation was reasonable, the disciplinary process fair (despite lost CCTV footage which was not determinative), and dismissal was within the band of reasonable responses given the seriousness of admitted allegations and cumulative nature of the misconduct. The claimant's reputation and the school's reputation were balanced but dismissal was appropriate.

Practical note

A teacher can be fairly dismissed for gross misconduct where cumulative inappropriate comments to pupils include discriminatory remarks and safeguarding breaches, even where some comments were intended as 'banter', particularly where behaviour continued after an informal warning to be more careful.

Adjustments

Polkey reduction100%

Tribunal found claimant would have been fairly dismissed anyway if fair procedure followed given seriousness of admitted allegations and behaviour despite prior warning

Contributory fault100%

Claimant caused or contributed to dismissal by blameworthy conduct including discriminatory comments to pupils and breaches of safeguarding despite warning to be careful

Legal authorities cited

Foley v Post Office [2000] ICR 1283Foley v Post Office [2000] ICR 1283J Sainsbury v Hitt [2003]Polkey v A E Dayton Services Ltd [1988] ICR 142British Leyland (UK) Ltd v Swift [1981]BHS v Burchell [1978] IRLR 379

Statutes

ERA 1996 s.94Equality Act 2010ERA 1996 s.98

Case details

Case number
2401197/2024
Decision date
4 June 2025
Hearing type
full merits
Hearing days
3
Classification
contested

Respondent

Sector
education
Represented
Yes
Rep type
solicitor

Employment details

Role
Mathematics teacher
Service
5 years

Claimant representation

Represented
Yes
Rep type
barrister