Cases2309014/2024

Claimant v Transport for London

13 May 2025Before Employment Judge E FowellLondon Southremote video

Outcome

Claimant fails

Individual claims

Otherdismissed on withdrawal

The claims were withdrawn by the claimants and dismissed in their entirety by the tribunal.

Facts

Two claimants, Mr Kelly Mullins and Mr Daniel Dixon, brought claims against Transport for London. Both claimants were represented by a lay representative, Mr Reid, while the respondent was represented by counsel instructed by Eversheds Sutherland. The hearing was conducted remotely by video.

Decision

The tribunal dismissed the claims in their entirety following their withdrawal by the claimants. No substantive hearing on the merits took place as the claimants withdrew their claims before any determination was made.

Practical note

This case demonstrates a procedural outcome where claimants withdrew their claims against a well-represented public body employer before reaching a substantive hearing.

Case details

Case number
2309014/2024
Decision date
13 May 2025
Hearing type
dismissal on withdrawal
Hearing days
1
Classification
procedural

Respondent

Sector
transport
Represented
Yes
Rep type
barrister

Claimant representation

Represented
Yes
Rep type
lay rep