Claimant v Network Rail Infrastructure Limited
Outcome
Facts
The claimant's claim had been struck out on 2 November 2020 under Rule 39(4) for failure to pay a deposit that had been ordered by Employment Judge Davidson. The claimant had applied for reconsideration of the deposit order, but Employment Judge Elliott was unaware of this application when making the strike-out decision. The case came before the tribunal on reconsideration of the strike-out decision.
Decision
The tribunal revoked the strike-out decision of 2 November 2020. The judge found that had they been aware of the pending reconsideration application against the deposit order, the claim would not have been struck out under Rule 39(4) pending a decision on that reconsideration application.
Practical note
A claim should not be struck out for non-payment of a deposit under Rule 39(4) when there is a pending reconsideration application challenging the deposit order itself.
Case details
- Case number
- 2206741/2018
- Decision date
- 12 May 2025
- Hearing type
- reconsideration
- Hearing days
- 1
- Classification
- procedural
Respondent
- Sector
- transport
- Represented
- No
Claimant representation
- Represented
- No