Cases6018435/2024

Claimant v Amazon UK Services Limited

7 April 2025Before Employment Judge YardleyLondon Southremote video

Outcome

Claimant fails

Individual claims

Unfair Dismissalstruck out

Claim struck out because the Claimant did not have the necessary two years' qualifying service pursuant to Section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and the claim was not presented within the applicable time limit.

Direct Discrimination(race)struck out

Claim struck out under Employment Tribunal Rule 37(1)(a) for having no reasonable prospect of success. The alleged acts of race discrimination took place after the Claimant's employment had ended and the claim was not presented within the applicable time limit.

Facts

The Claimant brought claims for unfair dismissal and race discrimination against Amazon UK Services Limited. The Claimant did not attend the preliminary hearing. The alleged acts of race discrimination occurred after the Claimant's employment had ended. Both claims were presented outside applicable time limits and the Claimant lacked the two years' qualifying service required for unfair dismissal.

Decision

The tribunal struck out both claims. The unfair dismissal claim failed due to lack of qualifying service and being out of time. The race discrimination claim was struck out under Rule 37(1)(a) as having no reasonable prospect of success because the alleged discrimination occurred post-termination and was out of time.

Practical note

Claims alleging discrimination that occurred after employment ended face jurisdictional hurdles and must still be brought within statutory time limits to have reasonable prospects of success.

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

ERA 1996 s.108

Case details

Case number
6018435/2024
Decision date
7 April 2025
Hearing type
preliminary
Hearing days
1
Classification
contested

Respondent

Sector
retail
Represented
Yes
Rep type
barrister

Claimant representation

Represented
No