Cases3305120/2024

Claimant v Victory Locum Limited

1 April 2025Before Employment Judge TynanSouth Easton papers

Outcome

Claimant succeeds£1,000

Individual claims

Unlawful Deduction from Wagessucceeded

The respondent failed to present a valid response on time. The Employment Judge determined the claim under rule 21 of the Rules of Procedure and found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages.

Facts

Mr Eyeta brought a claim for unauthorised deductions from wages against Victory Locum Limited, a company operating in the healthcare locum sector. The claim was filed on 13 June 2024. The respondent failed to present a valid response within the required time limit.

Decision

The Employment Judge determined the claim on the papers under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure, which applies when a respondent fails to enter a response. The Judge found in favour of the claimant and awarded £1000.00 gross for unauthorised deductions from wages.

Practical note

Default judgments under rule 21 can be made on the papers where a respondent fails to enter a response, and the tribunal will determine what remedy is appropriate based on the claim form.

Award breakdown

Unpaid wages£1,000

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure rule 21

Case details

Case number
3305120/2024
Decision date
1 April 2025
Hearing type
rule 21
Hearing days
Classification
default

Respondent

Sector
healthcare
Represented
No

Claimant representation

Represented
No