Cases3310633/2023

Claimant v Conquest Care Homes (Peterborough) Limited

26 March 2025Before Employment Judge TynanCambridgein person

Outcome

Partly successful

Individual claims

Unfair Dismissalsucceeded

The Tribunal found that the Claimant was unfairly dismissed by the Respondent. However, the Tribunal determined using Polkey principles that there was a 60% chance the Claimant would have been fairly dismissed by 20 April 2023 in any event.

Discrimination Arising from Disability (s.15)(disability)failed

The Tribunal found the Claimant's complaints of discrimination because of the protected characteristic of disability were not well founded and dismissed them.

Facts

Mrs Kilby worked for Conquest Care Homes (Peterborough) Limited and was dismissed. She brought claims of unfair dismissal and disability discrimination. The case proceeded to a four-day full merits hearing before a full tribunal panel.

Decision

The Tribunal found the dismissal was procedurally unfair and the Claimant succeeded in her unfair dismissal claim. However, all disability discrimination claims failed. The Tribunal applied a 60% Polkey reduction, finding the Claimant would likely have been fairly dismissed by 20 April 2023, and made a 60% reduction to the basic award for contributory conduct.

Practical note

Even where dismissal is procedurally unfair, substantial Polkey and contributory fault reductions can significantly reduce compensation where the employee's conduct would likely have led to fair dismissal.

Adjustments

Polkey reduction60%

60% chance that the Claimant would have been dismissed by the Respondent in any event by 20 April 2023

Contributory fault60%

60% reduction to the basic award to reflect the conduct of the Claimant before notice of termination of employment was issued to her

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

ERA 1996 s.122(2)ERA 1996 s.123(6)

Case details

Case number
3310633/2023
Decision date
26 March 2025
Hearing type
full merits
Hearing days
4
Classification
contested

Respondent

Sector
healthcare
Represented
Yes
Rep type
barrister

Claimant representation

Represented
Yes
Rep type
solicitor