Cases3201458/2024

Claimant v Amazon UK Services Limited

12 March 2025Before Employment Judge ParkEast Londonremote video

Outcome

Claimant succeeds

Individual claims

Unfair Dismissalsucceeded

The tribunal found the dismissal was unfair. A 20% Polkey reduction was applied indicating the tribunal accepted there was some procedural unfairness but also considered there was a chance a fair procedure would have resulted in dismissal. A 30% contributory fault reduction was also applied, indicating the claimant's conduct contributed to some extent to the dismissal.

Wrongful Dismissalsucceeded

The tribunal found the dismissal was wrongful, indicating the respondent dismissed the claimant without proper notice or committed a fundamental breach of contract in the manner of dismissal.

Facts

Mr H Mohammed was employed by Amazon UK Services Limited and was dismissed. The tribunal heard evidence over two days by video. The judgment appears to be a liability and remedy decision following a full merits hearing. The claimant was represented by a trade union representative and the respondent by counsel.

Decision

The tribunal found both the unfair dismissal and wrongful dismissal claims succeeded. However, significant reductions were applied: a 20% Polkey reduction reflecting the chance a fair procedure would have resulted in dismissal, and a 30% contributory fault reduction to both awards reflecting the claimant's conduct contributed to the dismissal.

Practical note

Even where dismissal is found to be both unfair and wrongful, substantial reductions for Polkey and contributory fault can significantly reduce compensation where there are procedural failures but the employee's conduct was a contributing factor.

Adjustments

Polkey reduction20%

20% reduction applied to compensatory award indicating tribunal found there was a chance a fair procedure would have resulted in dismissal

Contributory fault30%

30% reduction applied to both basic and compensatory awards under sections 122(2) and 123(6) ERA 1996 for the claimant's conduct contributing to the dismissal

Legal authorities cited

Polkey v A E Dayton Services Ltd [1988] ICR 142

Statutes

ERA 1996 s.122(2)ERA 1996 s.123(6)

Case details

Case number
3201458/2024
Decision date
12 March 2025
Hearing type
full merits
Hearing days
2
Classification
contested

Respondent

Sector
logistics
Represented
Yes
Rep type
barrister

Claimant representation

Represented
Yes
Rep type
union