Cases2301272/2024

Claimant v Compass Group UK & Ireland Ltd

2 September 2024Before Employment Judge Fredericks-BowyerLondon (South)remote video

Outcome

Claimant fails

Individual claims

Unfair Dismissaldismissed on withdrawal

The tribunal dismissed the unfair dismissal claim because the claimant was not an employee of the respondent and therefore had no standing to advance the claim. Without employee status, the claimant could not bring an unfair dismissal claim under the Employment Rights Act 1996.

Breach of Contractstruck out

The notice pay claim was brought outside the primary time limit under s111(2)(b) Employment Rights Act 1996. The claimant failed to attend the hearing and provided no evidence that would justify an extension of time, leading the tribunal to conclude it had no jurisdiction to hear the claim.

Facts

Mr Thorpe brought claims for unfair dismissal and notice pay against Compass Group UK & Ireland Ltd. The claimant did not attend the preliminary hearing despite being given notice, had not complied with tribunal orders for disclosure and witness evidence, and could not be contacted during the hearing. The tribunal proceeded in his absence under Rule 47.

Decision

The tribunal dismissed both claims. The unfair dismissal claim failed because the claimant was not an employee of the respondent and therefore had no standing. The notice pay claim was out of time under s111(2)(b) ERA 1996 and the claimant provided no evidence to justify an extension of time, meaning the tribunal had no jurisdiction.

Practical note

Non-attendance at hearings combined with failure to comply with tribunal orders and lack of employee status will result in dismissal of claims, particularly where jurisdictional issues exist.

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

Employment Rights Act 1996 s.111(2)(b)Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013 Rule 47

Case details

Case number
2301272/2024
Decision date
2 September 2024
Hearing type
preliminary
Hearing days
1
Classification
procedural

Respondent

Sector
hospitality
Represented
Yes
Rep type
in house

Claimant representation

Represented
No