44
Total cases
19
Contested
31.6%
Claimant success
contested only · 19 cases
£1,635
Average award
where awarded
2
Avg hearing days
Contested hearing outcomes
Claimant succeeds6 (31.6%)
Respondent succeeds13 (68.4%)
“Claimant succeeds” includes fully and partly successful claims. Based on 19 contested hearings.
Case classification
19
Contested
20
Procedural
5
Default
Recent contested hearings
Claimant v The Chief Constable of Greater Manchester Police7 November 2025
Claimant v Coventry Building Society23 October 2025
Claimant v NP Integrated Technology Ltd3 October 2025
£1,370
Claimant v Kitchens of Cheshire Limited (in creditors' voluntary liquidation)11 September 2025
Claimant v Primary Care 2429 August 2025
Claimant v Fastmove Lettings Limited26 August 2025
£1,440
Claimant v Northwest Payments Limited22 July 2025
Claimant v R Thompson and G Smith [As trustees for and on behalf of the members of the Hale Lawn Tennis Club]26 June 2025
Claimant v The Shady Oak Bar and Kitchen Limited11 June 2025
Claimant v Berlitz Manchester5 June 2025
Claimant v Holly Townhill, trading as Victoria's cafe30 May 2025
£2,765
Claimant v Pinnacle B2B Limited27 May 2025
Claimant v Alder Hey Children's Hospital NHS Foundation Trust8 May 2025
Claimant v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions6 May 2025
Claimant v Ministry of Defence Guard Service22 April 2025
Claimant v Mersey Care NHS Foundation Trust4 April 2025
Claimant v ETC & Co Logistics Limited24 February 2025
£750
Claimant v TRM Electronics Limited17 February 2025
£1,848
Claimant v BGC Bidco Limited [now called Tiger Feet Limited]3 February 2025
Most heard claim types
Unlawful Deduction from Wages6
Unfair Dismissal6
Discrimination Arising from Disability (s.15)5
Direct Discrimination3
Other2
About these figures
Figures are derived from published tribunal decisions on GOV.UK. Not all decisions are published. Success rates reflect contested hearings only and exclude procedural disposals and default judgments. These figures describe case outcomes and should not be interpreted as a measure of judicial quality.