139
Total cases
98
Contested
86.7%
Claimant success
contested only · 98 cases
£9,550
Average award
where awarded
2
Avg hearing days
Contested hearing outcomes
Claimant succeeds85 (86.7%)
Respondent succeeds13 (13.3%)
“Claimant succeeds” includes fully and partly successful claims. Based on 98 contested hearings.
Case classification
98
Contested
12
Procedural
29
Default
Recent contested hearings
Claimant v Royal Surrey NHS Foundation Trust11 December 2025
Claimant v Harvey Jones Ltd (in administration)9 December 2025
Claimant v GH London Ground Handling Services Ltd24 November 2025
Claimant v Oxfordshire Mind13 November 2025
Claimant v Marks and Spencer PLC5 November 2025
Claimant v GXO Logistics FST Ltd21 October 2025
Claimant v Menzies Aviation (UK) Limited17 October 2025
Claimant v Coca-Cola Europacific Partners Great Britain Limited13 October 2025
Claimant v West Berkshire Council10 October 2025
Claimant v Respondent25 July 2025
Claimant v Qube Qualifications and Development Limited21 July 2025
Claimant v Qube Qualifications and Development Limited (in Creditors Voluntary Liquidation)21 July 2025
Claimant v Qube Qualifications and Development Limited21 July 2025
Claimant v Qube Qualifications and Development Limited21 July 2025
Claimant v Qube Qualifications and Development Limited21 July 2025
Claimant v Ministry of Defence Police10 July 2025
Claimant v Qube Qualifications and Development Limited (in Creditors Voluntary Liquidation)22 May 2025
Claimant v Qube Qualifications and Development Limited22 May 2025
£42,560
Claimant v Secretary of State for Defence21 May 2025
Claimant v Silverbird Global Limited (in administration)20 May 2025
Most heard claim types
Failure to Inform & Consult83
Breach of Contract50
Unlawful Deduction from Wages20
Harassment16
Direct Discrimination16
About these figures
Figures are derived from published tribunal decisions on GOV.UK. Not all decisions are published. Success rates reflect contested hearings only and exclude procedural disposals and default judgments. These figures describe case outcomes and should not be interpreted as a measure of judicial quality.